Proof One:
In the photo below,
you see that when you match the image size of the killer jet's tail fin
and that of the tail fin of a Boeing 757 and then overlay the Boeing so
that tail fins are aligned you find, as Richard Stanley and Jerry Russell
demonstrate below, that the overlaid image of the Boeing fuselage sticks
out past the obstruction which completely conceals the image of the actual
killer jet in the original picture. The killer jet, therefore, has to be
shorter and differently proportioned than the Boeing 757. This alone tells
us Flight 77 was not the killer jet.
But wait. We are
not finished yet. We had no right to make the Boeing 757 tail fin the same
size as the killer jet's tail fin. A Boeing 757 is over twice as long (155
ft.) as the Pentagon is high (71 ft.)! But, as seen by direct inspection,
the killer jet in the picture is not even as long as the height of the building,
much less twice its height. Thus the matched-tail-size Boeing overlay shown
above is scaled far too small for a real Boeing 757. An actual Boeing 757
in the same position as the killer jet in the picture would present a much
bigger image. What Stanley and Russel have done is scale down a lion until
its tail is the same size as a cat, resulting in a puss-sized lion. Thus
even their overlay demonstrating that if the tail fin belonged to a Boeing
757 the plane's fuselage would have had to stick from behind the obstruction,
understates the case because the tail fin shown is too small for a Boeing
757 given its location with respect to the Pentagon.
Proof Two:
Civil engineers
have plotted to scale a Boeing 757 and the wall and supporting pillars of
the Pentagon. The pillars are labeled by number. All are agreed that the
nose of the killer jet hit the Pentagon at pillar #14. But the question
now becomes had the killer jet been a Boeing 757, as depicted in
this diagram, at which location in terms of pillars would the starboard
engine have hit the building?
Overlay of Boeing 757 on the American Society of Civil Engineers
Diagram by Jean-Pierre Desmoulins
Clearly, the starboard
engine would have hit on the first floor at pillar #16.
Except that it didn't. Look below. Pillar #15 has been blasted near ground
level (although if a Boeing had hit, the fuselage would have had to have
entered at the level of the ceiling of the first floor to allow for the
engines which hang lower than the fuselage, BUT WHAT ABOUT PILLARS 16 AND
17?
As the above picture
and many other photos that were taken at this time show, pillar # 16 is
still there, albeit blasted so that it inclines to the right; and pillar
#17 is also present and accounted for. Moreover, we also see there is interior
wall perpendicular to the fallen outer wall that is still standing inside
the building exactly where a starboard engine, had the killer jet been a
two-engine Boeing 757, would have had to have penetrated. Clearly there
was no starboard engine. An explosion occurring to the left of pillar #15
caused damage to the pillars to the right of it and brought down some outer
wall on the first floor wall, but a large turbofan engine of a Boeing 757
never penetrated here. Thus we know that the killer jet was a single-engine
aircraft.
You have now seen enough to know that the "small-plane" evidence
is deserving of careful examination. I
believe we can overthrow the 9-11 conspiracy and bring peace and justice
and better lives for all if we simply get these crucial findings to the
public.
